Did you know that the office furniture industry is responsible for a considerable amount of carbon emissions, contributing to climate change? By reusing and recycling office furniture, we can reduce the carbon footprint, conserve resources, and save money.
This educational guide will explore the environmental impact of office furniture and highlight the benefits of adopting sustainable practices in your workplace.
Before we continue let's get some understanding behind common terms used within the Circular Economy sector.
The circular economy is a model of production and consumption, which involves sharing, leasing, reusing, repairing, refurbishing, and recycling existing materials and products as long as possible. In this way, the life cycle of products is extended. Here is a list of key terms and their explanations:
Understanding these terms provides a more nuanced view of the different phases of product lifecycles and the strategies for sustainability in each phase within the circular economy framework.
Our journey started in 1983, we have been at the forefront of promoting the reuse and recycling of office furniture. While our commitment to the circular economy has been a cornerstone of our ethos from the very beginning, it was not until 2020 that we began to meticulously quantify the impact of our initiatives.
We acknowledge that, in hindsight, the systematic recording of data since our inception would have provided a richer historical account of our contributions to sustainability. Nevertheless, through careful estimation, we are proud to report that from 1983 to 2020, we have successfully repurposed approximately 88,800 items of used office furniture. This considerable effort has culminated in a significant environmental impact, with an estimated reduction of over 6 million kilograms of CO2 equivalent.
Beginning in 2020, we have embraced a new era of transparency and accountability in our environmental efforts. We have implemented robust tracking mechanisms that allow us to meticulously monitor and report on our progress. Our records now meticulously capture the total number of items we have refurbished and recycled, a testament to our commitment to sustainability.
Furthermore, we have achieved significant strides in measuring the total weight of materials we have diverted from landfills through our recycling endeavour's. This quantitative approach extends to our calculations of carbon footprint reduction, where we now have the capability to provide estimates on the total carbon emissions we have mitigated through our operations.
This data not only demonstrates our ongoing dedication to environmental responsibility but also enables us to set benchmarks for continuous improvement. We are not just keeping track; we are setting a track record for excellence in office furniture reuse.
The disposal of such large quantities of office furniture has multiple environmental implications:
Considering these factors, there is a strong argument for more sustainable practices in the management of office furniture at the end of its lifecycle. Initiatives might include:
The figures provided by WRAP, if recent and accurate, should serve as a call to action for businesses, policymakers, and waste management professionals to develop and support initiatives that address this issue. Collaboration across sectors can lead to innovative solutions that keep office furniture out of landfills and in productive use for as long as possible.
The situation described by WRAP, with significant volumes of office furniture such as chairs and desks ending up in landfills, presents a substantial opportunity for expansion in the third-party remanufacturing and refurbishment sector. This sector can play a crucial role in a more circular economy by extending the life of office furniture. Here’s how:
By seizing these opportunities, third-party remanufactures and refurbishers can significantly reduce the environmental impact of office furniture waste, support the transition to a more circular economy, and build a robust market for sustainable office furniture solutions.
Sustainability in Action: 19,058 Items of Office Furniture Successfully Repurposed
Environmental Impact: 1,934,299kg of Material Recycled and Reclaimed
Climate Progress: 2,915,560kg CO2eq Reduction Achieved Through Reuse and Recycling Efforts
Eco-Milestone Achieved: 43,498 Items of Office Furniture Recycled and Diverted from Landfill
Last reviewed 31st December 2023
1.1 Material extraction and production
1.2 Transportation and distribution
2.1 Reducing carbon emissions
2.2 Conserving resources
2.3 Cost savings
3.1 Assessing and planning
3.2 Choosing sustainable materials
3.3 Partnering with professionals
The carbon footprint of office furniture is an important aspect of overall environmental impact. By reusing and refurbishing office furniture, businesses can reduce their carbon emissions, conserve resources, and save money. Implementing sustainable practices in the workplace is not only good for the planet, but it also contributes to a more positive and productive work environment.
Product | Carbon Footprint (New) | Carbon Footprint (Refurb) | Travel Miles Equivalent (Refurb) | Energy Equivalent (Refurb) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Task Chair | 72kg CO2e | 36kg CO2e | 183 Miles | 154 kWh |
Visitor Chair | 36kg CO2e | 18kg CO2e | 91 Miles | 77 kWh |
Desk High Pedestal | 28kg CO2e | 14kg CO2e | 71 Miles | 60 kWh |
Bookcase | 18kg CO2e | 9kg CO2e | 45 Miles | 39 kWh |
Wooden Filing Cabinet | 48kg CO2e | 24kg CO2e | 122 Miles | 103 kWh |
Tambour Unit | 50kg CO2e | 25kg CO2e | 127 Miles | 107 kWh |
Steel Pedestal | 44kg CO2e | 22kg CO2e | 111 Miles | 94 kWh |
Wooden Cupboard | 31kg CO2e | 15.5kg CO2e | 78 Miles | 66 kWh |
Rectangular Desk | 35kg CO2e | 17.5kg CO2e | 89 Miles | 75 kWh |
Sofa | 90kg CO2e | 45kg CO2e | 229 Miles | 193 kWh |
Armchair | 43kg CO2e | 21.5kg CO2e | 109 Miles | 92 kWh |
Product carbon data sourced from FIRA and WRAP.
When considering the carbon footprint of office furniture, it's helpful to understand the real-world implications of these emissions. Below, we detail the environmental impact of a refurbished office chair with 36kg of CO2e emissions by comparing it to the emissions from driving an average petrol car in the UK.
Vehicle Reference for CO2e Comparison:
Using this average vehicle as our standard, we find that the CO2e emissions avoided by choosing a refurbished chair instead of a new one with 36kg of CO2e are equivalent to the emissions from driving this car for about 183 miles whereas a brand new office chair which emits on average 72kg CO2e which would equate to traveling 366 miles.
This transparent comparison aims to provide a tangible perspective on the environmental benefits of sustainable choices in office furnishings.
The data provided in the example was constructed using general figures that are widely recognised for such calculations. The specific figures for the UK would typically come from the following types of sources:
When considering the carbon footprint of manufacturing a new office chair for example versus refurbishing an existing one, several factors contribute to the difference in emissions:
Manufacturing Emissions (New Chair - 72kg CO2e):
Refurbishing Emissions (Refurbished Chair - 36kg CO2e):
Even with a 50% reduction in emissions during the refurbishment process, there are still emissions involved due to the following:
The key takeaway is that while refurbishing significantly reduces the carbon footprint compared to manufacturing a new chair, it is not a zero-emission activity. The reduction to 36kg CO2e represents the emissions avoided by not engaging in the more resource- and energy-intensive process of creating a new chair from scratch.
To convert 1 kg of CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) into kilowatt-hours (kWh), you need to know the specific activity or energy source that produces the CO2e. This is because the amount of CO2e produced per kWh varies significantly depending on the source of the energy. For example, coal-fired power plants emit more CO2e per kWh compared to natural gas or renewable energy sources.
In the UK, the average CO2e emissions per kWh of electricity can be used as a reference. The UK's grid average, as of the last update, was around 0.233 kg CO2e per kWh. This figure represents a mix of different energy sources, including fossil fuels and renewables.
One kilogram of CO2e is equivalent to approximately 4.29 kWh of electricity, based on the average CO2e emissions per kWh of electricity in the UK.
4.1 Light Iron Recycling
The recycling of light iron, which is often a term for thin-gauge steel, can result in significant energy savings and therefore carbon emissions reductions when compared to producing steel from raw materials. The carbon savings from recycling steel come from a few different areas:
Energy Savings: The energy required to melt and reuse scrap steel is much less than the energy needed to produce steel from iron ore. Recycling steel uses about 60-74% less energy compared to producing steel from virgin materials.
Reduction of Carbon Emissions: Using less energy means that fewer fossil fuels are burned, which directly leads to lower carbon emissions.
Resource Conservation: Recycling steel conserves the raw materials (iron ore, coal, and limestone) that would otherwise be used to make new steel. This in turn reduces the carbon footprint associated with extracting, transporting, and processing these materials.
The exact figure for carbon savings can vary based on several factors, including the efficiency of the recycling process and the type of energy used. According to some estimates, recycling a ton of steel can save around 1.8 tons of iron ore, 0.6 tons of coal, and 0.05 tons of limestone. The CO2 savings are typically estimated at about 1.3 kilograms of CO2 per kilogram of recycled steel.
Using this rough estimate, recycling 1 kilogram of light iron could save around 1.3 kilograms of CO2. So, for example:
These figures are approximations and can change based on technology, the mix of energy sources used in the recycling process (e.g., the amount of renewable energy), and the specific processes at the recycling facility. Additionally, the carbon benefits of recycling can also depend on the transportation and collection efficiencies, since moving the scrap metal to recycling facilities also consumes energy.
4.2 Polypropelene (PP) & polyamide (PA6GF)
Recycling plastics like polypropylene (PP) and polyamide 6 with glass fiber (PA6GF) also conserves resources and reduces greenhouse gas emissions compared to the production of virgin plastics. The specific amount of CO2 saved can vary depending on the recycling method, the efficiency of the recycling process, and the source of energy used in the process.
For polypropylene (PP), estimates for CO2 savings from recycling can vary widely, but to give a rough idea:
For polyamide 6 with glass fibre (PA6GF), the calculations are more complex due to the additional processes involved in handling the glass fibre component. However, the principle remains that recycling this material is generally less energy-intensive than producing virgin PA6GF. The exact CO2 savings would depend on many specific factors, including the efficiency of separating the glass fibre from the polymer, the quality of the recycled material, and the subsequent applications.
There is less data readily available for the specific CO2 savings from recycling PA6GF, but considering that glass fibre reinforced plastics often require more energy to produce, the savings are likely to be significant as well, possibly in a similar range to or higher than PP when considering the full life cycle of the material.
For more precise data, you would need to refer to life cycle assessments (LCAs) for these specific materials, which take into account all stages of the product's life - from production through to disposal - to determine the total carbon footprint and potential savings from recycling. Manufacturers of these plastics may also provide specific data based on their proprietary recycling processes.
4.3 Melamine Faced Chipboard Recycling
Melamine-faced chipboard, often used in furniture and cabinetry, is composed of wood chips bonded with a melamine resin, which is a type of plastic. Recycling or repurposing it is more challenging than recycling untreated wood due to the resin content. However, when melamine-faced chipboard is recycled as biofuel — usually in waste-to-energy plants — it can offset the use of fossil fuels, leading to savings in carbon emissions.
The carbon savings from using melamine-faced chipboard as biofuel would come from two main areas:
Displacement of Fossil Fuels: When used as biofuel, the chipboard's energy content displaces that of the fossil fuels it replaces. Wood products are considered to be carbon-neutral over their lifecycle, assuming that the carbon released during combustion is offset by the carbon absorbed by replacement tree growth. The resin component, being a fossil-based material, would not be carbon-neutral, but it would still potentially offset fossil fuel use.
Avoided Methane Emissions: If the melamine-faced chipboard were to end up in a landfill, it could decompose anaerobically and produce methane, a potent greenhouse gas. By recycling it as biofuel instead, these methane emissions are avoided.
The exact carbon savings would depend on several factors, including:
A general estimate for wood as biofuel suggests that 1 ton (1,000 kg) of dry wood used as fuel can displace around 0.8 to 1.1 tons of CO2 emissions that would have resulted from coal. Since melamine-faced chipboard is not entirely wood (due to the resin content), its energy content and carbon displacement per ton would be slightly less than that of pure wood.
For a more accurate assessment of the carbon savings from recycling melamine-faced chipboard as biofuel, you would need to know the specific energy content of the chipboard, the proportion of melamine resin to wood, and the type of fossil fuel being displaced. Life cycle assessments (LCAs) tailored to the particular waste-to-energy facility and the specific type of chipboard being processed would provide the most precise figures.
4.4 General Waste or Refuse-derived fuel
Refuse-derived fuel (RDF) is created from various types of waste that are not suitable for traditional recycling, including non-recyclable plastics, paper, cardboard, and wood. The waste is shredded, dehydrated, and sometimes pelletised or fluffed to improve its consistency and burning properties. RDF is used as a replacement for fossil fuels in power generation and in industrial processes such as cement kilns.
The CO2 emissions savings from using RDF depend on several factors:
Composition of the RDF: Since RDF is made from a mixture of waste materials, its composition can significantly affect its energy content and the emissions associated with its combustion. Materials with a higher plastic content, for instance, will generally have a higher energy content and might produce more CO2 when burned compared to materials with a higher proportion of biogenic (plant-based) content.
Type of Fossil Fuel Displaced: The CO2 savings will also depend on which fossil fuel the RDF is replacing. For instance, natural gas has a lower carbon content per unit of energy compared to coal. Displacing coal will generally result in higher CO2 emissions savings.
Energy Efficiency of the Process: The efficiency of the energy recovery process impacts the net CO2 savings. Modern, high-efficiency incinerators that capture the energy generated for electricity or heat are more beneficial in terms of CO2 savings.
Carbon Neutrality of Biogenic Content: The plant-based portion of RDF is often considered carbon-neutral because the carbon released during its combustion was recently captured from the atmosphere during the plants' growth, assuming that more biomass is grown to replace it.
Considering these factors, general estimates suggest the following:
Coal Replacement: Burning RDF instead of coal can save between 0.8 to 1.1 tons of CO2 per ton of RDF used because coal has higher carbon emissions per unit of energy produced.
Natural Gas Replacement: Natural gas has lower carbon emissions per unit of energy, so using RDF in place of natural gas would result in lower CO2 savings.
In Europe, where RDF use is more common, the average CO2 emissions savings are estimated to be around 0.5 to 0.8 kg of CO2 per kg of RDF used when replacing coal. This is a broad estimate and actual savings could vary based on the specific conditions mentioned above.
It's important to note that while RDF can save on CO2 emissions compared to fossil fuels, there are other environmental considerations such as the potential release of pollutants and the need for effective emissions control systems to minimise any harmful impacts from combustion.
Coggin Sustainable Office Solutions is a leading provider of sustainable office furnishing services in the UK. Our mission is to support businesses in reducing their carbon footprint by providing eco-friendly alternatives to traditional office furniture acquisition and disposal methods. We specialise in refurbishing office furniture, reupholstering office seating, resizing office desks, and offering zero landfill office clearance services. By partnering with Coggin Sustainable Office Solutions, businesses can create greener office environments while receiving value back from their existing assets.
5.1 Refurbished Office Furniture
5.2 Office Seating Refurbishment
5.3 Office Desk Resizing Service
5.4 Zero Landfill Office Clearance Service
Coggin Sustainable Office Solutions is dedicated to helping businesses across the UK reduce their carbon footprint and promote eco-friendly office practices. Our range of services, including refurbished office furniture, office seating refurbishment, office desk resizing, and zero landfill office clearance, provide cost-effective and sustainable alternatives to traditional office furnishing methods. By choosing Coggin Sustainable Office Solutions, businesses can create more sustainable work environments, contribute to a greener future, and receive value back from their existing office assets.